On this particular occasion I had
a rather long drive ahead. Though I longed for an A3, on receipt of the Astra I
was neither pleased nor displeased. The Astra is a perfectly capable
middle-ground car which you can drive for days, weeks or months but it’ll not
leave a lasting impression.
![]() |
| Astra in its natural habitat |
As with my previous Astra, this too was an SRi. And again, it also lacked any real sporting presence to justify the badge. The wheels were different and so was the badge on the boot. Equipped with these pieces of evidence I have just spent a lengthy amount time on the Vauxhall website and have established the difference between the models. The car in question here is equipped with the 1.6i VVT rated at 115ps. The previous Astra was the 1.4i 16VVT Turbo rated at 140ps. Despite being so similar, there were some rather apparent differences between the models below the surface.
Inside, it was all familiar Astra
surroundings. Again, the wheel hints at Bluetooth connectivity but I couldn’t
find any way of activating it. I am curious though as the Vauxhall website does
state it is equipped with it? The biggest difference however was the inclusion
of a conventional lever operated handbrake. I don’t know why Vauxhall would go
to the trouble of having the “same” cars with different handbrakes but it was
strange how something which you would consider so insignificant could make a
big difference to the feel of the car. Although I have argued the case of the
electric handbrake in the past, I would choose the conventional set up as seen
here for my own car. The boot swallowed my two bags, several milk crates and
weekly shopping without much fuss but I did note the opening was quite small
and the boot lip high.
![]() |
| Busy dashboard can be confusing to use |
The interior in the latest Astra
is modern. You sit far back from the windscreen and I found that in order to get
comfortable I was quite low in the car resulting in an odd sensation of peering
over the dashboard. Furthermore the arm rest on the door was too far forward
and the centre arm rest too far back to be of any use. Why they haven’t made
the central arm rest adjustable I don’t know. Perhaps they might like to add
some softer materials and padding to the construction whilst they’re at it - my
elbow was soon suffering when I did contort my arm into such a position that I
was able to use them. Otherwise the Astra made for a good motorway cruiser with
acceptable levels of wind noise, easy to use cruise control and an impressive
sound system.
Once off the motorway and onto
rural roads the inherent differences between the two SRI’s became apparent.
Where the 1.4 soon felt stressed and skittish through the bends the 1.6 was a
more flowing and coherent package. Feedback from the wheel was still limited
but grip was impressive and not once did the chassis feel out of depth as it
did in the 1.4. Unfortunately the same cannot be said for the engine. Progress
was limited unless you were prepared to utilise every one of the 6,500RPMs
available – and that soon got tiring, particularly as your efforts weren’t
rewarded with any form of pleasing engine note.
![]() |
| Its an SRI - but can you tell? |
As a practical car the Astra
makes a sound case for itself. Despite lacking in outright charisma it performs
all routine tasks with diligence, although many may find the petrol engines
rather alcoholic – over a distance of roughly 280 miles I used almost a full
tank of fuel! The use of the SRI badge remains slightly fraudulent but if
Vauxhall were able to mate the 1.4 turbo engine to the 1.6 chassis, throw in
some spoilers and bits of carbon, then they may well have something close to
what an SRI should be.






